Comments on: Fuckanomics in the Spotlight

By: Raz

Raz — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:17:08 +0000

As the linguistic trailblazer behind the term “fuckanomics”, I’d like to point out (or rather highlight) that it is economics in its broader sense – all benefits monetary, monetizable, non-monetary, tangible, intangible, perceived, political, and other. In short, all calculations of investment/return that surround the act of packing one meat inside another.

By: DirkJohanson

DirkJohanson — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:07:34 +0000

I’m a Guyinist, not a mathematician – been a long time since I got that 770 (or was that on the GMAT?).

Lately, I’ve also been and, lately, a Keynesian Fuckaholic – $150 just last night, not to mention tolls and gas for over 100 miles of round-trip driving.

By: Iceman Cumeth

Iceman Cumeth — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:20:03 +0000

Keynesian Fuckanomics = those times when you’re so horny you spend more money than you can afford on sex, on the theory that you need to satisfy your needs just so you can get back to working and making money at all.

Chicago School Supply Side Fuckanomics = responding to being horny by going on sex austerity or celibacy, to try and kill your sex drive, which you think is more efficient.

One quibble:

“While there has almost always been some variation in price from girl to girl, at the time, Mons Venus lap dances averaged out to about $20. Thus, under Icemans’ analysis, $20 was actually worth one lap dance. When we would say, grab a hamburger together afterward, while the burger may have been listed as selling for $4, Iceman and I would refer to the burger as actually selling for ”a quarter” of a lap dance.”

I’m familiar with both of our SAT math scores, and so I’m quite sure we did a more mathematically accurate job on the conversion …