Meet the Hooker’s Parent

June 30, 2009
Meet the Hooker’s Parent

A lot of guys don’t like meeting the parents of a girl they’re seeing because they want to make a good impression on their future in-laws, or at least possible future in-laws.  I’ve been there, but having survived single into my mid-40s, one might imagine that I’ve met a lot of chicks’ parents when it was clear to me marriage wasn’t going to be in the cards. 

Normally, I don’t like meeting the parents of a girl I’m seeing for a different reason – it usually just seems like a fraud, like my intentions are a lot more than just schtupping their daughter until I can either upgrade or the daughter moves on due to obvious lack of intent to commit on my part.  After all, like most guys, no girl hot enough to make me temporarily insane enough to want to marry her is willing to date me for more than a couple of weeks, and even those opportunities are few and far between.  So, I’ve met a lot of parents of girls I was seeing in particularly uncomfortable situations. 

Once, as a second date, the girl arranged for her parents to join us to see some really lame comics at a comedy club.  They laughed their heads-off at the jokes largely centered around the paucity of teeth in Arcadia, Florida.  I’d rather have had to fake enjoying foul-smelling sex – at least when I’ve had to fake enjoying sex, my back wasn’t facing the stage, I wasn’t expected to pony up for two rounds of overpriced cranberry juice I didn’t want, and I was naked.

There’s been other weird parent-meetings.  Another girl I’ve dated has invited me to Christmas dinner at her mother’s house twice - and both times there was another dude there that also thought he was her date for the evening.  The endless, self-serve dinners turn into a contest between us as to which of us is going to most gingerly fill his plate with seconds.
 
And of course, there are always those awkward moments where the parents inquire as to future plans that ain’t ever going to happen.
 
I hate meeting the parents.  I especially hate meeting the parents after only two dates.  But when a guy is in his mid-40s, both dates occur almost entirely in bed, the girl is a hooker, and she invites the guy to her 21st birthday party, well, a guy needs to make an exception, especially when he writes a sex-blog.  Even a guy like me, that hates meeting the parent(s).
 
Here she is:
 

 
Yes, those tits are real – remember, she’s only 21 – now – those are young boobs.

The birthday celebration was to consist of two parts, as Tori (real alias) explained to me when she arrived at my crib Monday night.  The first, the “formal” part, was to occur at 5 PM on a Saturday (this past weekend) at her mother/father’s house (Tori explained that her single mother is also her father).  Her parent was going to prepare a traditional Filipino meal.  The second part was clubbing, which was going to start at 11.  “More bisexual 21 year-old hookers,” I thought to myself, “out for a night on the town drinking legally together for the first time,” I added to myself.  “You should come,” she stated.

I almost did cum  – right then and there.

In the days leading up to the party, I had to figure out what to get Tori for a present.  One problem with dating girls you’ve dated as hookers, as I’ve been known to do, is that the $200 or so charge for the sex is a limitation on how cheap the present can be.  Last time Tori came over, she charged me $220.  The $220, which didn’t even include the usual added price tag of drugs and/or alcohol since she doesn’t do drugs and didn’t want a drink, was well worth it  – we went two long rounds over the course of 4 1/2 hours, punctuated by two hours of spooning – but it meant that a $20 birthday present wasn’t going to cut it. 
 
Now, one of the benefits of dating hookers is that they’re usually easy to shop for.   Anything sex-related – lingerie, belly chains, even molds of my penis.  Today’s nympho-escorts can easily drip-drench a half-dozen pairs of panties a day – they generally arrive at my crib juicy in anticipation, and leave even juicier, in no small part due to generous applications of Wet Platinum lube – so they particularly welcome new thongs, which in my experience can even bring a more appreciative reaction than the many-times-more-valuable cash “gift” for the session itself.

But this situation was a bit more complicated – Tori’s mother was going to be there when I gave Tori the present, and might even be watching when Tori opened it.  Clearly, I had to tone it down – no penis mold -  and decided Victoria’s Secret was the perfect store, and some sort of fragrance a perfect product, to strike that balance.  After all, Vic Secret is in mainstream malls, yet the only Vic Secret girl I ever dated had also been an escort who I’d met at a 2-on-2 afterparty (as an aside, I’ll never forget the first words she ever spoke to me, while I sat next to her on a couch sandwiched on the other side by my then-girlfriend, whose idea it was to swing that night - “I like cum – just not on my face.”).

The afternoon of the party I went to a high-end mall.  The mall, including the store, was particularly crowded, almost exclusively with people, mostly young, many of whom were heavily-tattooed, who look like they don’t work serious jobs for a living (strippers? escorts? drug dealers? foreclosure rescue consultants?), and many of whom I presume were maxing out their credit cards in preparation for filing bankruptcy or enrolling in debt settlement programs.  Nonetheless, as expected, soon after entering the fragrance section of the store and perusing the Dream Angels shelves, I was approached by a sales girl, a fairly-hot early 20s Latina.
 
Sales Girl (SG):  Can I help you find anything in particular?
 
DJ:  Yes.  I’m trying to find a gift for a 21st birthday, but its complicated.  We’re in that awkward stage where our relationship is going from hooker and john, to boyfriend and girlfriend and,
 
SG: 
 
DJ:  so I can’t just get a cheap present, cause when you pay someone $200 for an hour, you can’t just get something cheap for like $20.
 
SG:  Makes sense
 
DJ:  and its more complicated than that, since her mother’s going to be there – I can’t get a thong –  and probably already isn’t going to like me at first sight since I’m more than twice her age, but my girl is young – so I want to get her something that young chicks like, too.  So, I’m thinking fragrance, so is this a good one?
 
SG:  I was going to say:  no.  Definitely not that one.  That’s for older women.
 
DJ:  OK, good.  I’m glad you told me.  Hmm.  What about the one that’s the hot chick smell?  You know which one I’m talking about?
 
SG:  No. 
 
DJ:  Hmm.  I thought you guys made the one with the hot chick smell    Well, is there a PINK perfume?
 
SG:  Yes, over here….
 
And so it went.  I picked up a few items with the PINK label, including a perfume in a funky sack, a makeup bag, a candle, and a package of temporary tattoos, many of which were half-off, and the total came to only around $40.
 
Since Victoria’s Secret only wraps things which prominently advertise the name of the store, I then needed a gift back to go over the VS bag.  After picking one up at American Greetings, I had another thought, though:  since nearly all of the items I picked up at VS were half price, the total cost was too cheap.  If Tori returned the items, or if, being in the core VS customer base she knew about the half-off sale, I would come across as cheap, not something you want a hooker to think of you, especially one willing to go multiple rounds over the course of four hours for the price of an hour.  Time running out on being able to figure out a good physical present, I decided I’d better head over to Nordstrom’s and pick up a $50 gift card, the envelope for which served the additional purpose greeting card, so $4 was saved.
 
Told the 5 PM party would be running on Filipino time, which meant that most people wouldn’t be arriving until 6 or 6:30, I timed my arrival to be on the later side, but ended up running slightly behind, got a little lost, and showed up a couple of minutes after 7, parking my car exactly at the same time as what turned out to be her 50-something Filipino aunt, who had pulled into the spot seconds before.  There were suspiciously few cars near the house, which I had expected would be ensconced in a virtual festival.  The aunt and I greeted each other, I introduced myself, and we proceeded to the front door together, first greeted by a sign telling us to remove our shoes, and, seconds later, by Tori and her mother.  Tori laughed and blurted, “I really didn’t expect you to make it,” and for a second I wasn’t entirely sure I was going to be allowed entry, but I was.
 
As it were, the aunt and I were the first guests, and the only other people there were Tori, her mother, and her mid-50s Latino step-father.  Thankfully, Tori’s parent and her husband were significantly older than I, or at, thankfully, their Hispanic heritage at least made them look older.  The house was shabby, with sheets covering most of the upholstery, even most chairs, and there were handwritten signs on loose-leaf paper throughout the house.  I soon learned this was all because the house had very recently been a low-end assisted living facility.  The aunt and I were immediately escorted to a living area, where I was seated next to the aunt in front of a large karaoke screen featuring what I assume was the Manila skyline.  Within seconds, the aunt, and then everyone else, asked me if I was going to sing karaoke, and the aunt passed me the mike.  Having not fucked Tori enough to be willing to sing in front of her without fearing harm to my image, and having neither consumed enough alcohol or dropped enough acid to want to sing karaoke in a house of strangers aside from my two-time sex provider, I declined over repeated objections, and the aunt proceeded to sing a series of morose songs, including Clapton’s Tears in Heaven.  It felt more like a funeral, or at least a 90th at an A.L.F., than a 21st birthday party.
 
Tori soon advised me that 10 people from Ohio who were expected weren’t going to be able to make it.  Despite the aunt singing karaoke, I was way too much the center of attention of a party which I had expected to be large and which I was only planning to drop in on – and the food  – an array of Filipino specialties – wasn’t even ready, now more than two hours after the party’s official start time.  I had to keep turning down offers of alcoholic beverages, including a beer shoved in my face by the step-father even after I declined it, and to keep turning down offers to take the karaoke mike.
 
Finally, after what seemed like two hours but was only about 15 minutes, the food was ready, and most of it was quite good, albeit barely recognizable – probably a good thing since the fish in the only Filipino restaurant I’d ever eaten in was served with the heads.  By then, three more people had shown up, two guys and a woman, all white, weird, apparently Midwestern, and well into if not past their 50s, and I chatted with them, too, though it was a bit dicey when one of them asked me my connection to the party.  “I know ,” I said, looking at her.  Tori quickly blurted out, “we’re friends.”  Unfortunately, during the conversation with the weird ones, I inadvertently left a strong hint as to my relatively advanced age, when one of them said, “you look familiar” and I responded with my standard joke, which goes over a lot better with chicks in a club than it did at the party:
 
DJ:  You watch MSNBC?
 
Weird guy:  Yes   Ah, maybe that’s it.
 
DJ:  You’d have to really be into it.   I was on twice, 9 years ago.

As if that weren’t enough, it wasn’t long before the weird woman of the group, apparently taken somewhat aback at the relatively advanced age of Tori’s apparent date, asked me my age  – at the same time “guessing” I was 37, a number at which I usually take offense even though I’m almost a decade older.  I responded with my standard, usually line-of-conversation-stopping joke,
 
“I’m actually EIGHTY-7″ 
 
“You are not,” blurted one of the weird guys.
 
DJ:  “How come nobody ever believes me?!!!!!  Just cause I look this good?”
 
Weird guy:  “Come on.”
 
DJ:  “I turn 88 in December – I was born in 1921.  I go to the gym every day …”
 
After what seemed like eternity, but was less than an hour, Tori grabbed a purse and started for the door, telling her mother she was just going down the block for a few minutes to the store.  The two bickered back and forth in front of everyone about whether Tori should leave.  Seeing it as an opportunity to bolt the party, and suspecting in fact that Tori was going to be gone a long time since she had earlier said she had to pick up a friend 45 miles away, I quickly decided I would use her exit as an opportunity to leave, but before I could say a word, Tori asked me if I wanted to come with her, an opportunity I seized – I think I was half-way up off my chair before she could finish the question.
 
I got in Tori’s beater with her, but after we had gone further than the nearest convenience store, my suspicions that I was in for a long ride I didn’t want, or need, to be on (since the clubbing part of the party was presumably still on) were confirmed.  Unfortunately, by then, Tori was already on the phone, with the friend, telling the friend we would soon be there, grossly lying about how close we were.  She then started defensively asking a series of questions obviously in response to suspicious questions asked by the friend upon hearing my voice.  Adding two-and-two, I surmised that the friend on the other end of the line was the suddenly-on-again fiance she had told me about last time she was over when he was off and I’d inquired about the ring on her ring finger.  Before I could confirm my suspicion, she confirmed my suspicion, “, my fiance that I told you about.” 

“His name is Tyson, and he needs a ride?!!!!,” I thought.  Uh, oh – not THAT Tyson!

Now I really wanted to get out of the car, but she wasn’t responding to my hints to hang up the phone so I could tell her to turn around and drop me off back at the house so I could spare myself a 45 minute ride with her angry fiance - a fiance already angry about her being late, already angry about her having an unexplained middle-aged guy in the car.  A fiance who could get angry about all the other things he was already angry with her about in their rocky relationship.  A fiance who could get a lot angrier if they had a blow-up and she blurted out that I happened to be one of her johns, and that she awoke me from deep slumber just a few nights before for a round two which ended with sperm all over her face and breasts.  Besides, I’m claustrophobic and didn’t want to have to sit in the back seat. 

I met substantial resistance.  Tori insisted that I continue on.  She explained that the only was she was able to assuage her mother to let her leave the house was by bringing me along, which probably meant one of two things:  either her mother wanted me out of the house badly, or her mother considers Tori still to be too much of a child to drive to the corner store alone – a far more disturbing possibility even though her family effectively vetted her for me as being legal age by throwing the party.  After about another mile I driving, I managed to talk Tori into turning around and take me back to the house, convincing her to drop me off a few blocks from the house and that I’d quickly drive away so her mother wouldn’t notice.
 
On the way back to the house, Tori asked me what club she should go that night.  I told her where I had backup-planned to go and meet friends, but she said they couldn’t go there because Tyson is underage. , “even clubs where people didn’t wear clothes.”  Not that an engaged chick would ever cheat, Gail Collins if you’re reading this, but Tori enthusiastically responded,
 
“I’ve always wanted to go to one of those swinger’s – is that what they are called  – swinger’s clubs?” 
 
DJ:  They are a lot of fun.  The best one I’ve been to is down in Lauderdale.
 
Realizing that might be a bit long of an out-of-town trip for an engaged chick to have to explain to her fiance, after a short silence I added, “but there are a lot of good ones around here, too.  Maybe next weekend we’ll go and celebrate your 21st birthday that way.”
 
Tori:  OK, but you have to promise me that you won’t let Tyson know.  He’s a country-type guy, real traditional, and he wouldn’t approve of anything like …
 
DJ:  No problem.  Mum’s the word
 
Seconds after Tori dropped me off, I received a text from a petite, married, 50ish Colombiana I had met about six weeks ago at a club, dirty-and-booty danced with for hours to the extent of hands-on-penis-and-vagina rubbing, and taken out a couple of times after, but to no sex avail, other than French kissing in that same mall parking lot.  “Hey,” she texted.  I called her immediately back.

DJ:  You back from the Dominican Republic?

MW:  No, I’m in New York.  That’s why I thought of you.
 
After some small talk about the weather and such,
 
MW:  So, you don’t like me?

DJ:  Not true.  I like you.
 
MW:  Then how come you don’t call me?  Because I don’t order sandwiches?”
 
DJ:  No  

MW:  Then why?
 
DJ:  I have needs .
 
MW:  Well, I was going to come over to your apartment the next time we went out.  I’ll tell you what – I can see – I can see that you are a free-type guy who doesn’t like to be tied down.  We be friends.  Next time I will come over to your apartment.  I promise.  Next time I will come over.
 
DJ:  So when will you be back again?
 
MW:  Sunday
 
DJ:  OK – I’ll call you after you are back.  Talk to you then and enjoy the rest of your trip.
 
MW:  OK.  Bye.
 
Gail Collins and Cokie Roberts, ye of the angelic sex (see Take Me Out to the Sapphic Sex Romp ) if you’re reading this, that makes two women that are planning to cheat with 5’9″, mid-40s, mid-level government-employee me in one week.  Imagine that!
 
Now to figure out which swinger’s club to take Tori to …

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

Take Me Out to the Sapphic Sex Romp

June 27, 2009
Take Me Out to the Sapphic Sex Romp

With so much of America and my readership in the grip of All-Things-Republican-But-Ron Paul Derangement Syndrome, I’m not defending Mark Sanford – as he was four-square behind Clinton’s impeachment, he does not deserve it.

 I just object to the stepped-up misandry in the wake of his “disappearance.”  Comments such as this by Gail Collins in the New York Times:  “Second, perhaps it is time to rethink the idea of constantly electing middle-aged heterosexual men to positions of high importance.”  A similar remark was uttered by serial misandrist Cokie Roberts (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2009/06/05/abcs-cokie-roberts-agrees-sotomayor-women-are-better), whose father made impassioned speeches against desegregation in the 50’s and refused to vote for LBJ’s Civil Rights Bill in ‘64, when she extended the family brand of hate speech on TV, implying that cheating is just a guy thing.
 
Its not like women and gay guys don’t cheat, too.  Lets not forget New Jersey Governor McGreevey.  As for broads, their cheating rate, including former Congresswoman Helen Chenoweth ( http://jezebel.com/tag/helen-chenoweth/) is widely-believed to be about 2/3 that of guys – not exactly a massive gender gap.  DNA testing is revealing that a tremendous number of husbands are not actually the fathers of their wives’ babies – paternity fraud rates are approaching 30% according to some studies.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_fraud#cite_note-MommySecret-1  Of course, women are notorious for understating the number of sexual encounters, to the point of absurdity.  You’ve all known women that understate their number of partners.  I’ve known multiple hookers who don’t count it as sex unless they do it with a guy who doesn’t pay – these girls have literally chopped over 1000 guys off their lifetime totals.   Here’s one of them:   ite.mht  (Mea culpa – I used to not count hookers in my total, either - before I came to think they should count as at least double).  And, yes, there are even married escorts whose husbands have no idea – I fucked at least one that was engaged with a wedding date set and who married soon afterward.  Here she is: ashley.mht (for the record, she requested, and I obliged her with, a serious face blasting, so I don’t think any of my cum directly landed on the engagement ring she was wearing).  

 

Here’s an article by one such cheating dog, Atlantic Monthly contributor  Sandra Tsing Loh.  http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/divorce  (of course, by having a career, Loh is actually a double cheater – see She’s cheating on you – why shouldn’t you cheat, too?).
 
On top of their dalliances with guys, married women often don’t count it as cheating if they have sex with another woman.   With girl-on-girl, not to mention girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl-on-girl … sex, rapidly eclipsing baseball as the national pasttime, its quite likely that women now cheat more than guys if cheating is defined to include having one’s vagina licked by someone other than your husband or steady while you have one.  When a guy has lunch with a woman that’s not his wife, eyebrows are raised and people whisper.  When a couple of, or three or five, broads leave the office for lunch to go back to one of their houses and whip out the vibes to use on each other, no one suspects.  They should.
 
So, lets put things in perspective, even for a decidedly unGuyinist schmuck like Sanford.  He’s just another tall, rich, at-least-decent-looking, famous guy cheating on a not-hot middle-aged broad he probably didn’t love in the first place.  His job, like nearly all jobs in politics, is nowhere near as important as it sounds – like most politicians, his real job is - irrespective of right and wrong and the best overall policy – hoodwinking us into thinking his job is important and he is good at it so he can move up to another office, enriching his friends, and setting himself up to cash in as a lobbyist using his insider connections to facilitate “public” service.  Governor of South Carolina?  What was happening in South Carolina that was so important the few days he was gone that it couldn’t wait?  There probably hasn’t been anything in South Carolina urgently requiring the Governor’s physical presence since the first shot of the Civil War – its not like the New Jersey National Guard was about to put down the pizza pie and attack Charleston.  Some governor’s can’t get bills passed – Sanford’s vetos can’t even survive.  hollyvideo.mpghollyvideo.mpghollyvideo.mpghollyvideo.mpghollyvideo.mpgAnd in this era of modern communications, until I hear otherwise, I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt that he was carrying with him a smartphone with RSS feeds informing him of anything that may have been going on of importance in South Carolina, not to mention presumably reading his email, online South Carolina newspapers, and probably some Tweets. 

Finally, if Sanford wasn’t an inmate in the marriage prison, and if we had a guys’ right to choose, would this have ever happened?  All those emails, traveling all the way to South America to get laid?  C’mon.   We don’t need more broads in public office – we just need more broads allowed to sell sex. 

What if this had happened to George Washington?  You don’t think he was ever out -of-pocket for five lousy days? 

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

“I’m unemployed and I live with my parents”

June 10, 2009

For the record, that does not describe me – I’ve been employed at a job I hate for more than five years, and I’ve had my own crib, without even so much of a roommate for a quarter century.  OK - not counting an inexplicably hot homeless woman in Hawaii that managed to move in with me for the better part of a week in 1986 after I fucked her not realizing she was homeless.

No, those words don’t describe me – those are the words of George Costanza in a 1990 episode of Seinfeld, when he tried doing everything the opposite of what he had been doing, and introduced himself to a hot waitress who was immediately turned on. 
 
Of course, that was television.
 
Turning now away from television to another corner of not real life, academia, last Saturday, I was graciously allowed to attend part of the Eastern & Midcontinent Joint Regional Conference of The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality.   Strip Club god -check that - the actual Lord God that people around the world pray to whether they realize it or not – Joe Redner, was a speaker (his topic:  “The history of nude dancing in Tampa, Florida,” which he somehow managed to fit into only an hour and a half), as were a host of professors from a large swath of the country.   
 
This was not my father’s sex seminar (my father actually went to sex seminars – he was a gynecologist). The titles to the various seminars were fascinating, and those I attended grabbed and held my interest by the collar.  Topics included “Read between the lines:  An analysis of print media coverage of sex workers,” “From the Devil in Miss Jones to the DMJ6 – Trends in the (gendered) count of US adult films,” “How swingers find other swingers:  The commercialization of the swinging lifestyle,” and “The cost of the cum shot:  A synergistic view of HIV/STI risk in the Adult Film Industry.”  The presenters were mainly female, but there were a few guys mixed in – the kind of Type B-guys that look like they became sex academicians mainly so they wouldn’t be hard up – coincidentally, one of the very same reasons I’m I’m thinking about going into the field!   Here’s a link to the conference website: 
http://www.sexscience.org/uploads/media/ER-MR_2009_Prelim_Program.pdf 
 
I attended three seminars, all in the Women’s Sexuality concurrent session (conspicously absent was a session about our sexaulity).  The first session, “Menstrual cycle influences on women’s attention and neural response to potential sexual partners,” was presented by Dr. Heather Rupp of The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University-Bloomington, a gorgeous early 32ish babe who I’d gladly break the $350/hour barrier for even without a DFKCIM (“deep French kiss with cum-in-mouth) finish.  I don’t know what she’s done since having this lousy picture taken (http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/rupp.htm), but whatever it is, it should be mandatory for all chicks.   Speaking of menstrual cycles, I’d pay full kitty even if she was bleeding, and not wash my top sheet for a week.

More relevant than her appearance, here’s her c.v.:  http://www.iub.edu/~kinsey/research/pdf/Rupp_CV.pdf  To her credit, Dr. Rupp has made studying female physical attraction to guys a big part of her studies, and who among us guys who spent the 80s and 90s being lambasted for, do I dare say, being attracted to attractive chicks can’t appreciate that!  As the title to her seminar discloses, part of Dr. Rupp’s work has ventured into determining variations of what chicks like based upon the stage in the menstrual cycle.  Having been aware of some previous studies in this area, at least one of which concluded that chicks like more masculine guys just before ovulation and more feminine guys after, needing as many weapons in my girl-getting arsenal as I can get, and Rupp being so freakin’ hot, my interest was piqued.
 
Rupp’s study is described at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071114182256htm and the actual detailed article, for you serious students, is at http://www.indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Rupp_masc_fmri_2008.pdf   While I admittedly spent part of the time daydreaming about what our babies would look like and how nice her asshole would feel wrapped around my tongue while my nose explored the upper end of her butt crack, I really did manage to pay attention to her talk – thank goodness for my having dropped two loads from my balls in a hooker-in-heat’s mouth the night before to ease my usual Saturday afternoon tension (here that hooker is, in case you are interested, which you should be, at least when she’s in heat: nicole-needs-protein.mht ). Anyway, here is the question the participants were asked:
 

Please imagine yourself in the situation described below and make your decision as if you were in that situation. You are not in a committed relationship and are open to a sexual encounter. You and some friends are out Friday night. While out, you meet the man presented in the image for the first time. You two have a good time talking together and that continues into the evening. You and he end up back at his place to continue hanging out. It is clear to you that he would have sex with you if you want to. Imagine that you are in this scenario and open to a sexual encounter. Based on the image and information presented, please indicate using the button box:

How likely would you be to have sex with him?

1=Very unlikely

2=Unlikely

3=Likely

4=Very likely
 
 
Unfortunately, in paying attention to Rupp was saying, I found an astounding flaw based upon my own research findings that come from dating as long as Rupp has been living:  according to Rupp, the biggest factor in a woman’s choice to go home with a guy she just met and have sex with him was “
the sexual health risk of the individual” as related in the paper, or, as stated more basically during the session, the number of sex partners the guy had been with.  The study was about meeting a guy out and hooking up with him for sex, and yet the MRI results indicate that women would rather go home and have sex with a guy who has had fewer sexual partners. 

 
This may be what all the female teachers are thinking when they bang their 14 year-old students, but chicks looking for sex out in a club? NOT!!!!!!  Yes, because its obvious that girls are combing the clubs looking for that quiet guy in the corner who looks like he wants to put a revolver to his temples from watching his 6’2″ friend pick up girls every Friday night that he would marry, only to hear stories about the taller friend leaving the girl with a facial, bolting in the middle of the night without so much as bringing her a warm towelette or a Cum Kleen, and never calling her again. 

Yes, because its obvious that girls in clubs respond best to guys who approach them respectfully and ask them things like, “so, what did you major in?”, as opposed to guys that pull up behind them on the dance floor, grab them around the waist, the shove their phalluses into their backs. 

Sure, because girls preferring guys with fewer partners is how, as a recent study determined, 15% of guys have 85% of all heterosexual sex. 

Of course, because this must explain why five or six chicks gang up on rock stars backstage. 

Naturally, because how else to explain why Derek Jeter can’t get laid anymore, and there’s a text message service which sends out an alert to women on where to find “ballers ( e.g., “I just saw michael jordan leave the club with 10 white girls in a stretch hummer Sent from New York, NY on March 18th, 2008 at 10:14 AM” – http://www.mozes.com/balleralert?pg=9).  Yes, at a little after 10, A.M.

Undoubtedly, because how else to explain that Tyrese Gibson has been able to put out the alert that girls can cut the line to his bedroom by first getting a tattoo on their ass with his name on it.  http://www.nypost.com/seven/06112009/gossip/pagesix/none_butt_mine_173641.htm

 Because women never want the alpha male or to fuck their hot best friend’s boyfriend.  Because no Lady would ever be Gaga singing, “And baby when its love if it’s not rough it isn’t fun.”  Because no chick would ever get gaga at the thought of “making love” to a thug like Usher ” .. in this club …. on the couch, on the table, on the bar or on the floor, you can meet me in the bathroom, …” and because guys who don’t get it much are known to doggie chicks they just met while the chicks’ heads are stuffed halfway into the toilet bowl in a crowded club bathroom, slapping their asses red the whole time.  Not even DirkJohanson has ever pulled that one off (the closest I came was six years ago when I did a G-ing 23 YO on the ladies’ room sink in my office building bathroom, but it was after hours and the building was empty).

And, in my own personal experience, I remember when I was younger and hadn’t had many partners, or if I’m in a slump now, that going up to girls all nervous and unconfident from not having gotten laid in a while is what makes them want to immediately go home and have sex with me!  And they particularly get turned on when the guy who hasn’t had it in a while is unemployed, and even more so when he is unemployed and lives with his parents.  Oy fucking Vey! 

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned???  Horsefeathers! – hell hath no fury like a woman approached by a sincere guy with good-intentions!  I know, damnit -  I know you’ll find this hard to believe, but that guy is actually me sometimes!

So I raised my hand and asked Rupp (who I swear had said something to the effect of “of course” when reading her conclusions about fewer sex partner preference) something to the effect of,

 ”uh, women prefer guys with fewer sex partners? That seems contrary to everything I’ve ever observed.” 

I half-expected her to say something like, “yes, well, you know, sometimes actual behavior deviates from the MRI results” and cite some study, but like a deer in the headlights seeming to immediately realize that someone had called out a ludicrosity in her work, she replied something to the effect of,

“what observations are you referring to?,”

to which I replied something characteristically incoherent sounding but clear enough under the circumstances like,

“um, like, life, my life, everything, going out, the world, since the beginning of time, and stuff.” 

I never got to hear Rupp’s answer – the older, unkept lady who let me into the seminar bolted over to my seat, bent over, shushed me, and admonished me to hold my questions to the end – though interestingly enough, she didn’t shush the broad who asked a question just after I asked mine.

Of course, if what Rupp’s study showed was actually true, one might expect that, unless some guys were incredible at lying, nearly all single guys would have an approximately equal number of sex partners, or at least equal on some sort of annualized basis.  After all, if what women were really after was a guy without many sex partners, guys who had more than their share would stop getting any, and guys who hadn’t would get more.  In fact, however, I’ve observed that when I get laid, suddenly women are all over the place, unconsciously following me around for the next two days, attracted by the smell of my having had recently had sex – long after I shower!
 
Possibly the flaw in Rupp’s study was that the guys in the pictures were too impossibly good-looking for the paltry number of sex partners assigned – she kept flashing an image of a big, good-looking black guy who the study purported had been with only 5 women in his life.  “Five women this month alone,” I thought to myself – and the seminar was held on the afternoon of the 6th!  The study disclosed that the pictures were downloaded from publicly-accessible websites.  Me suspects it was Model Mayhem.
 
Another possible flaw in the study is that there were ultimately only 12 participants.  Not that I scored 100% on all six of my Statistics exams over the two semesters I took the course at an Ivy League university but, well, come to think of it, I did score 100% on all six of my Statistics exams over two semesters at an Ivy League university and 12 is way too fucking small of a sample size to conclude jack about just about anything.
 
 I know I’m just a layman (pun intended), not a Kinsey Institute researcher like Rupp, let alone one so caring and compassionate, but obviously, there could be – ARE - some other things going on here.  One is that there could – just could - be a disconnect between what the women want in their heads and what actually happens.  Not that I’m implying that women can be talked into doing something they don’t want to do, or that they might sometimes think with their clits rather than their cortexes, but I do recall seeing a speed dating study a few years back concluding the fairly obvious: that women went to speed dating looking for a nice guy with sincere intentions, ended up choosing the players instead, and within days wishing they stuck to their original intentions going into the event, regretting having blown off the sincere guys.

What I suspect is really happening is that the undersexed chicks in the study were excited at the thought of the fantasy that there still existed such hot guys with so little experience.  After all, while a chick can’t possibly be too much of a whore for my own salacious taste, I do know plenty of guys who, for whatever reasons undoubtedly reflective of (legitimately or otherwise) insecurities (hey, we all have some), prefer chicks who don’t know their way around the bed sack or the nut sack.  Like the guys who bid for Natalie Dylan ( XX Factor Watch-Natalie Dylan ).  Like my friend George (real alias), who naively thought his hot Czech girlfriend had only been with one or two guys, when she was regularly threesoming with her best friend and black guys behind George’s back.

As an aside, is number of sex partners truly a measure of sexual health risk?  On the surface, the answer is “of course.”  Then again, has anybody ever heard of antibodies?  I used to feel like I was coming down with something every time I’ve so much as made out with a girl.  I’ve been going to swing clubs since 1993, and licking whores’ asses since about 1983.  I had unprotected sex with my career escort girlfriend several times a week for a year-and-a-half, during which time she was with roughly 1000 guys, and neither of us had ever had an STD – nada, nothing, zilch – more evidence that if you want clean pussy, go to a hooker. 

Getting back to Rupp’s study, in the meantime, I’m refraining from going up to chicks and opening with, “Hi – my name is DirkJohanson, and I’ve only slept with five women” – the pickup artists like Dave D’Angelo, and I’m confident the chicks themselves, would not approve.  Far be it from me that such a study might better be conducted not in an MRI, but in an actual club – vid the couples leaving and take down their plates, or perhaps follow them home and do exit interviews.  Why not?

The next speaker was Linda Henderson of Loyola of Chicago.  Her topic, “Shaping vanilla or awakening venus?  Women’s identities as sellers of sex toys via in-home parties.”  For her study that she reported on at the seminar, Henderson extensively interviewed a grand total of three (3) sex toy saleswomen (apparently, guys are more or less banned from working in the field, and from even attending the parties unaccompanied by a broad). 

One of the key findings Henderson presented was that in-home sex parties were popular with women because they didn’t like going to get sex toys in seedy adult bookstores in bad neighborhoods.  Hey, that’s a real gender difference right there!  Like back in the days before internet porn, I know when I was feeling horny, I wanted to drive into the hood, step over a wino, ask some guy old bi-guy with no teeth for tokens, go into a booth with a floor slippery from freshly-spewed AIDS-infected semen, barely be able to see the screen through other dudes’ dried cum, have some guy’s penis appear through a hole, and then come back out to the parking lot only to find my broken and my radio stolen.  I’ll tell ya – the difference between guys and girls!

I did actually learn something in Henderson’s seminar.  I learned a new derogatory-sounding term:  “heteronormative agenda.”  Apparently, the company at which the sex-saleswomen studied work refuses to sell things like double-dildos and such that serve the market largely composed of chicks that are still so mad at their 10th grade boyfriends or their ex-husband that they’d rather buy plastic penises than give some guy the satisfaction of being able to provide the real thing.  So, “heteronormative agenda” is what Henderson believes is the agenda of this company to promote women having sex with committed male partners.

Now I know what many of you’re thinking.  Why is DirkJohanson of all people, one of the world’s most outspoken advocates of not only banning heterosexual marriage but making a heterosexual marriage ban a veritable 11th commandment, standing up for those saps that stay together and stick it out through tough times, including times when they apparently feel the need to use sex toys since their genitalia alone aren’t really doing the trick?  I can’t answer that question.  I don’t know.  I can’t give you a reason why, but making it all seem bad just seems wrong.  I’m sorry to sound like a caring and compassionate person (I know – again!) by not being able to explain myself, but sometimes it just happens.
Thank goodness, an even more caring and compassionate attendee than I raised her hand, wasn’t shushed, and asked Henderson, “What agenda?  Aren’t they just trying to make a buck?”  Henderson had no answer for that, and admitted that she had been told that the company operated primarily in the Bible Belt and didn’t want to push the envelope too far.
All of this talk about a ”heteronormative agenda” got me thinking, though.  After all, if there could be a perjorative term for committed, loving, lifelong, nurturing, monogamous, though-thick-and-thin relationships, why not someone coming up with a positive-sounding word or phrase for a guy like me.  After all, “playboy,” its update ”player,” “whore-monger,” and just plain “monger” clearly aren’t in good stead except amongst us guyinist guys, “hobbyist” is way too vague, obscure, and can apply to lots of things including nerdy things like stamp collecting, and even “stud” just doesn’t sound right, especially when used in the first person or by a fellow guy.  “Playah” is an improvement, but not quite there.  “Baller” is a good word, but isn’t spot on and doesn’t really apply to a regular guy that gets sex $200 at a time.  Somebody call Frank Luntz.  Better yet, lets raise some money and I’ll call Frank Luntz.  If he can make wealthy players not having to pay income taxes on inherited money sound like a good thing, he can certainly make players sound good without the whole tax-avoidance angle.  (Actually, he can make anything sound good. After he’s done making guys like me sound good, I want him to come up with a new word to replace “shit”).

Moving on, the final speaker, Dr. Stephanie Marhefka of USF, interviewed of bunch of chicks with HIV to ask them about condom use.  Some of them ain’t wearing condoms, guys, so watch out.  I know you guys will all find it hard to believe a chick would take something out on you that another guy did to her, but one study participant even said she didn’t use condoms since the guy who gave it to her didn’t wear one, so why shouldn’t she seek revenge on the rest of us guys! Remember, when you marry a girl, you also marry every “asshole” who ever fucked her and left her, or even just dumped her, going back to middle school.

Marhefka seemed to be calling into question laws that require HIV positive people to disclose their status to prospective sex partners, but I was left to wonder whether she would be calling into question those laws had she interviewed HIV positive straight guys.

Then again, maybe there actually is a good reason the law should only apply to guys, such as a far higher transmission rate from guys to chicks than vice versa – but this blog is no place for a guy to be reasonable, so we’ll save these types of concessions for my Nixon goes to China moments later in my career.  Until then, I’ll try to refrain from anything even remotely smacking of care or compassion, or even something more in us guys’ department:  honest reason – we don’t have that luxury – for now, we have to focus on our own empowerment or it won’t be long before I’m really unemployed and really living with my parents.

Oh, and Dr. Rupp.  I know a lot of what I write here sounds tongue-in-cheek, but that part about my tongue in between your cheeks is entirely sincere, as was, that part about us having babies together.  I know – you think I’m high risk, but you’re wrong – for you, I’m no risk – I have no diseases, and I’m willing to marry you right away.

Well, then again, there is this tell-almost-all blog.

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

“The Penis Diatribes”

May 31, 2009

There is actually a play by that name, thought up by someone else (of course, I coined “Balls Monologues” and “cunt diatribes”).

Here’s a link to the website:  http://www.efmagic.com/thepenisdiatribes.html

After tonight’s show, the Writer/Director, Mike Matteo, related to me some of the hypocricies he encountered in trying to locate venues for the show, due to the name “penis” in the title – the same venues, such as the Tampa Bay Performing Arts Center, that eagerly allow “Vagina Monologues.”

I recommend the play, which is a lighthearted but insightful look at sad reality of relationships – primarily the relationship between a guy and his cock, but also between a guy and his cunty girlfriend (the sad part), between the cock and the cunty girlfriend, and between the cunty girlfriend and her pussy.

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

Deep Throat Revealed!

May 30, 2009

There is at least one website solely dedicated to women ripping “bad boyfriends.”  Here’s are two:   http://thebadboyfriendclub.ning.com/  http://www.ihatemen.com/dating_stories.cfm?catid=14&status=1     On those websites, the guys’ real names and intimate details are exposed.  Of course, “boyfriend” is the most overused word in the female lexicon.  Thus, usually the only reason these guys are considered “bad boyfriends” is because some braniac chick couldn’t figure out that the guy wasn’t even her boyfriend in any meaningful sense of the word in the first place. 

Which brings me to today’s topics – exposing another bad ”girlfriend.”  Of course, she wasn’t really a girlfriend, and I always knew that, but I’m confident she was not less of a girlfriend to me than 99.9% of the “bad boyfriends” were ever really boyfriends.  She was in it for the money, they were in it for the sex.  Our sex is their money – ergo, the situation is the same, except guys, we are able to figure such things out.

Anyway, as initially revealed in my little-read comment to “Balls” post leads to arrest of Dirty D ,”Sabrina” and “Jess” are none other than Tabatha Jessica Jennings of Tampa, formerly of Dunedin, Florida.  Yes, Tabatha Jennings is a hooker and in some really raunchy porn.

Sorry, Tabatha Jennings, but an adorable little hooker like you should be able to come up with a lousy $60, especially since you were given ample opportunity to pay off the debt in trade.  Sorry, sweetie, but you said you would pay me back within 3 days, and its been about two months.  Here you are, on May 1, the last time I heard from you:

I have not been trying to avoid you I have not had a phone or your number for weeks now. I am sorry I didn’t have your money right away things have just been very hard. I will drop off 30 dollars Monday sometime I’ll stick it under your door mat if your not home and I’ll have the rest of it by the end of next week. I do appreciate all you’ve done for me and I’m sorry I’m late paying you back but I will get it back to you this week.

I guess you’ll have to find something other to do with your career rather than teaching.  Wait, its Florida – never mind – teaching will be perfect for you:  http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1901762,00.htmlhttp://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1901762,00.html   Just close your eyes and make believe that the kid you are screwing is in his mid-40s, like me and the guys in your videos.

Speaking of which, I’ll leave you with some clips of Tabatha Jennings fucking, sucking cocks through a wall, swallowing cum, and having her ass filled with semen:

Here she is at Dirty D’s gloryhole

http://camgirlgalleries.com/gloryhole-girlz-068/pnk.html

http://www.spankwire.com/Sexy-Teen-Swallowing-Strangers-Cum-Loads-/video129233/

Here she is at a mini-bukkake with Dirty D’s cock in her:

http://www.tampabukkake.com/tour/gallery/sabrina_minibukkake/mgp1/?nats=572443:revshare:tampabukkake

Here’s a message board – apparently her first name was already revealed by a former co-worker at CVS:  http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=252064

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

Not-So-Secret Confessions of a John on a Medium-Sized Budget

May 28, 2009

I had sex with a published author tonight, Dimitra Ekmektsis, author of Secret Confessions of a High-Priced Call Girl.  Here she is:  http://eros-tampa.com/files/crescent2-crescent1.htm

I haven’t read the book yet, but, after talking about the book with her as well as about all sorts of other things,  I do recommend it, I mean her – heck, both her and the book.  She is a very interesting woman, and has a very nice ass.

The book is available on Amazon:  http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1439225664/ref=cm_cr_rev_prod_title

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

If this is “girl power”….

May 24, 2009

Most of us love an underdog, and I loved our family’s female dog growing up, so why not root for a female horse, which is like a dog, but bigger? 

The headline of the Beth Harris article screamed out “Girl Power.” http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/sports/45234457.html   The topic, filly Rachel Alexander’s vistory in the Preakness.

But wasn’t it speed, not power?  Why let facts get in the way of using an adjective to describe that favorite obsession of women.

And is a win by a filly for the first time in 85 years evidence of power.  I don’t recall seeing a headline “Washington Generals Power” the last time they beat the Globetrotters.

Meanwhile, her jockey, Calvin Borel, is a guy – a guy good enough to have ridden a 50-1 longshot guy horse to victory in the Kentucky Derby a few weeks before.  Put Rachel Alexander on the track without a jockey and I’ll believe the jockey had nothing to do with her performance – there’s a reason they weigh horses down for the race with the load of human being.

Borel is 5’3″ tall, and weighs 110 pounds, small even for a chick.  Obviously, incredibly few guys are small enough to be jockeys, and yet only 10% of jockeys in North America are female http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/sports/othersports/17seconds.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

If that’s girl power….

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

DirkJohanson in what’s left of the New York Times

May 19, 2009

I decided to chime in to a debate in the New York Times today over the explosion in single motherhood:  http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/a-new-trend-in-motherhood/

There were some great comments by fellow-Guyinists-at-heart – its clear, guys aren’t going to take it anymore – at least as long as we think we can cloak our real identities! 

Anyways, my two cents were: 
The basic underlying reason for so many unwed mothers is that there are many babydaddies that don’t want to marry their babymommas.  The reason for this is that women are now far more likely to sleep with a guy who is indifferent to them and merely wants sex than they used to be, when a guy really had to work for it.  Indeed, it is nearly universal among American women to reject guy suitors that evince sincere romantic intentions in favor of guys that exhibit indifference.  Moreover, a recent study concluded that only 15% of guys have 85% of all heterosexual sex, and, consistent with that, in recent years, women have become far less interested in the monogamy of their partners.  In other words, they are happy to share if the guy is a big shot, and proud to have those guys’ babies.

This phenomenom is what makes Silvia Henriquez’ policy proscriptions noxious, whether she intends for them to be noxious or not.  Ms. Henriquez wants to use tax money to subsidize this trend.  In effect, much of the tax money will be taken from guys with romantic good intentions to pay for out- of-wedlock babies born to women who rejected them in favor of oversexed players.  Guyinism recognizes that for those most of us guys who have spent our lives being rejected by the women we really desire only to see them knocked up and dumped by other guys who were indifferent to those same women in the first place, this policy is unacceptable – as in unacceptable-to-the-point-of-one-of-these-days-we-are-going-to-take-to-the-streets-to-stop-it unacceptable.  Its bad enough we can’t attain our romantic goals – taxing us for it only adds insult to injury.  I’m sure those many women who desire children but who have elected the readily-available options of birth control and abortion in order to defer motherhood until it is appropriately affordable feel similarly about providing a subsidy to those who can’t seem to balance their desire for immediate sexual and maternal gratification with the realities of home economics”

In sum, Ms. Henriquez, if women want to have children out of wedlock, I suppose that’s their choice.  Just don’t send the rest of us a bill – that really pisses us off.  For further details on similar gender issues, visit http:/guyinism.com

I couldn’t help but add another comment.  I’m not sure if it will stick on the site, so here it is:

In reference to the comments of CT Woman (#75), I agree that we are returning to our natural selves in some respects, although in some ways not – for instance, I cannot reconcile returning to our natural ways with the increased prevalence of homosexual conduct.  After all, the parts don’t fit, and there have been relatively minimal observations of homosexuality among other species, especially when heterosexual activity is available.

Anyway, even if we are returning to our natural ways, are you so sure both males and females will ultimately be happier?  Our natural selves, as well as the natural selves of innumerable species of animals, are almost undoubtedly the alpha male mating with all the females in the tribe.  This was reinforced to me recently on a swamp tour where it was related by the guide that the alpha male gator in that section of the swamp mates with 10-12 females a year and kills 10-12 smaller males a year.  Indeed, it is intuitive to me, and apparent from the animal kingdom, that extreme violence by and among males is probably the inevitable result of such an arrangement, and even that great majority of women that prefer bad boys (or at least guys who they think are bad boys) to the exclusion of sincere, hard-working types don’t seem very attracted to serial-killer level violence.  Moreover, those areas of our world where polygamy is officially and/or widely and openly practiced (certain Islamic countries and Africa) are also those countries where women are subjected to the most abuse.  Personally, I readily admit that if I were one of the guys shut out from sexual activity in such a society, I would not ultimately be happier, as you say.  In fact, I would, if at all practical, murder the mating male and rape females with impunity if that’s what it took to get sex versus having none at all, and I’m just a relatively mild-mannered, mid-40s, highly-educated, office worker (at least when I’m not out swinging, hiring hookers, and making porn). 

Probably the biggest reason I mention all this is that, if we are to return to our natural selves without widespread mayhem, it is almost certainly necessary to legalize the guys’ right to choose in the form of legalization of prostitution.  I hope you and others realize that while you may be enjoying the trend of concentrating your affections on a smaller number of “rock-star” males, as evidenced by the ascendancy of the MFF threesome, single motherhood, and the recent study finding that 15% of guys now have 85% of all heterosexual sex, as well as the trend of acting out faux lesbianism, that the trends are unsustainable, and almost inevitably will result in violent upheaval and/or repression unless a much greater number of guys are let in on the party.  That is one of the reasons why the most important precept of Guyinism is legalization of prostitution:  the guys’ right to choose. 

All-in-all, the issue of whether we are returning to our natural selves, and the ramifications of it, is fascinating, and I plan to post more about it.  For more on the precepts of Guyinism, as well as naked pictures of hot chicks I’ve had sex with, go to http://guyinism.com

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

Constant Barrage Watch

May 13, 2009

As you know, the mainstream media is a source of constant barrage of article claiming that women are better than guys at various things.  While I frequently respond to such articles with posts directly on the MM sites making these outlandish claims, some of which have been reproduced here, I do not have time to address even a small fraction – one human being could possibly have that much time.  However, on a semi-regular basis, I will be posting some of the biased and hateful MM articles here.

Today, msn.com has an article claiming that women are better investors than guys:  http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2009/05/12/are-women-better-investors.aspx

 I particularly like the response of Guyinist Paul Lester: 

“Notice how you almost never read the “Men are better at…” stories?  Because they aren’t politically correct!  Men are just testosterone laden brainless imbeciles and women are shrewd intuitive martyrs.  Call it the Oprah-nization of the mainstream media/press. Men are bad and women are good.  Everyone should know that!  What crap…”

I urge all of you to join in the chorus of voices such as myself and Paul Lester, and stand up to the constant barrage of articles claiming guys are inferior to women in just about every aspect of life by writing comments to sexist articles such as today’s article on msn.com.  In your comments, be sure you use the word “guyinism” in order to build traffic for this site, and for the movement.

As far as women and investments, I have three words:  Beardstown Ladies exposed.  See http://www.erictyson.com/articles/20090306_1

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

Elizabeth Edwards is a cheating dog!

May 12, 2009

Everyone knows Elizabeth Edwards is a dog.  But, she’s not just any dog.  She’s  a  cheating dog.   This is because she had her own career, and access to her own money to spend - while she was married to John.  Therefore, Guyinist doctrine recognizes that she, not John, cheated first (see She’s cheating on you – why shouldn’t you cheat, too? ).

IMO, with her frumpy looks even before she was dying, the Susan Boyle of American politics, the 21st century’s answer to Eleanor Roosevelt, should be thankful she’s managed to stay married to a tall, rich, decent-looking guy, as long as she has.  If he was a Republican, she would have already been served with divorce papers on her hospital bed.

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page
Share

Spread the Word About The Balls Monologues

Your Name*:

Your E-Mail*:

Recipients (Separated by commas):

TellYourFriends Plugin created by Jake Ruston's Wordpress Plugins - Powered by Pearl Forum and business logos.

Balls Monologues Classic Posts

Categories

  • No categories

Did you know?


Highlight It