EconGuyinism

Apparently the decision whether to keep the baby has been weighing heavily on her, which is why the threesome she had planned for us last Sunday with a cute petite lesbian she has had at least one three-girl (if you count her butch girlfriend) threesome with and who hasn’t been with a guy for five years did not materialize.  This is not the same girl I went out with a couple of years ago that had six kids by 30 with four different men, only one of which was her husband, nor is this my go-to hooker, Jess, who has no kids of her own but whose mother had 3 with 3 guys.

The scary thing is that, except for having a penchant of throwing lavish birthday parties for her children which cost into the thousands of dollars, an expenditure enabled by the fact that she lives with her mother, my 21 YO ex is actually relatively nice, normal, sensible, and intelligent relative to most of the women I know of breeding age.

If any of you still thinks the United States will have a thriving economy again anytime soon – and I doubt any of you still thinks that considering how demoralized even Larry Kudlow looks lately – think again.  Even if we manage to stop this runaway train of a meltdown, ..  Well, enough now-mainstream economic analysis for now- I’m sure you’ve had your fill lately. 

Anyway, I’m sure you all saw or heard or read the part of the president’s speech about responsibility.  I know – both parties are responsible for birth control – the problem is girls, especially girls that don’t like condoms or want to get a guy to commit, lie about it ALL THE TIME. And by the way, for all of you old ladies reading this that think the guy is the one always insisting on going with condoms and who want to throw a knife at me now, I have, never, once, ever, asked a girl if we could stop using or go without rubbers, but I’ve been asked that many a time.  (OK, truth be told, I have just stuck it in there bare a few times without any discussion, including at least once when it was met with protest, and one other time when my swinging partner later questioned me after she saw me doggie a blonde with a tramp stamp bare [hey, she fuckin’ hot] - but in all of the instances when discussion actually occurred, I have never been the one to raise it).

In a future post, I’ll lay much of the blame for the global financial crisis where it belongs but where hardly anyone has had the balls to say it belongs - on profligate debt-fueled spending by women, and profligate debt-fueled spending and investing by guys pressured to do so in order to curry favor with women. After all, how of much of this stuff do we guys really need? And yes, I know, you’re probably the one that wanted the flat screen – but with her spending all that money on LV, Jimmy Choo, granite, and stainless steel, shouldn’t you at least get to spend some on what you would like?  And us single guys have to keep up – its hard to lure a girl over to watch an HBO special on a 19? Zenith; its even harder to lure a hot broad into our 600 ft. sq. 1 BR when she can fuck an old-guy with a mansion on the beach.

 In future posts I’ll also discuss how the social-sexual environment created the conditions for this to occur - including,  

• how the stakes due to the incredible sexual value the hot, bisexual, swinger girls of today, versus the same boring wife of a generation or two ago, has caused us to spend more, since when a guy can come home for lunch, find his wife swimming naked in the pool with 2 or 3 of her friends, and get to fuck all of them before going back to the office, there’s some serious value in there worth investing some extra bucks on;

• how these hot, bisexual, swinger girls, Madonna, and Sex and the City, have lifted the materialism bar for other women to aspire to and exact from us, so that even trailer-park girls demand Coach;

• how young strippers with hordes of cash, and young professional women with huge credit card debt, end up getting used to their lifestyle, and end up with mammoth debts when they lose their looks;

• how girls prioritizing hot sex with bad boys (as in actual prison resident bad boys that don’t pay child support) end up buried in debt;

• how guys are forced to spend close to $200 for a tiny bag of white powder just to get hot chicks back to their place;

• how the internet, modernity’s equivalent of the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge, has raised awareness by women all over the globe of luxury spending opportunities;

and more.  Much, much, more.

Call my theory “EconGuyinism,” a sort of companion to the Ecofeminism movement that blames the world’s environmental degradation on guys (babble found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofeminism ) – because women are so much more in tune to nature, as we all know by how little makeup they wear, how little in the way of modern comforts and material goods they require, and from their (plastic) surgical masks and artificial breasts.

Here’s an excerpt from the Wikipedia page:  A central tenet in Ecofeminism states that male ownership of land has led to a dominator culture (patriarchy), manifesting itself in food export, over-grazing, the tragedy of the commons, exploitation of people, and an abusive land ethic, in which animals and land are valued only as economic resources. Other ecofeminists claim that the degradation of nature contributes to the degradation of women. For example, Thomas-Slayter and Rocheleau detail how in Kenya, the capitalist driven export economy has caused most of the agriculturally productive land to be used for monoculture cash crops. This led to intensification of pesticide use, resource depletion and relocation of subsistence farmers, especially women, to the hillsides and less productive land, where their deforestation and cultivation led to soil erosion, furthering the environmental degradation that hurts their own productivity Get a load of this one at http://eve.enviroweb.org/what_is/index.html: This opinion piece … addresses non-homeless men of all classes who assert an imagined privilege to urinate in public spaces (especially when drinking). Just because their penis is easily available with a zip of the pants does not mean men have license to urinate whenever or wherever they wish. At a minimum, it is rude and crude. More significantly, though, urine is an (ob)noxious form of pollution whose lingering stench fouls our urban communities. We have never once seen a woman urinate publicly,”

Well I have:  Cigdem (”Dee”) Warren of Clearwater, Florida, on the shoulder of the southbound side of the Howard Frankland Bridge (Interstate 275) connecting Tampa and Clearwater, circa 2002, after drinking (and group sex [including with me]) at Pleasure Palace.  There – women are busted!  And the overwhelming cat piss smell in her condo was quite noxious, too. I love this excerpt:

Men on the other hand, from childhood on through matrimony, are socialized to expect someone (mother? wife? maid?) to clean up after them. If men (whose needs invariably are given priority) would take greater responsibility for their personal waste, maybe this would lead to an increase in public toilets for both sexes.

Lady, you need to follow me around on dates (Iceman, I know who you’re thinking of right now, but there’s been enough controversy with her lately).

Why didn’t someone just punch the first Ecofeminist in the mouth and nip that ludicrous submovement in the bud?  Like we weren’t conquering everything for them anyway, those ingrates.  You wouldn’t even have a life if it wasn’t for fluid which came out of some guy’s cock and balls, bitch!  If only there were an outlet for Guyinism back then, before the anonymity (hopefully) of the internet age.